They Were Critically Ill. Abortion Could Have Saved Their Lives. They Weren't Given the Option.
A new study finds even more women who died because of abortion bans.
One woman had an ectopic pregnancy, but because doctors in her anti-abortion state were unclear on the law, they delayed the simple treatment that would have been immediately on offer in any blue state; she went into hemorrhagic shock and died. Another patient had a congenital heart defect that pregnancy was exacerbating; instead of offering an abortion, doctors tried to get her to 22 weeks of pregnancy, at which point she was given a C-section to save the baby, while she ended up on a ventilator in the ICU. A third had seven children and was not given the option to terminate when she became pregnant again; she died during delivery, and her children are now orphaned.
These are stories of women in “pro-life” America, told under cover of anonymity to researcher Katrina Hauschildt and her team at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. They interviewed doctors practicing in Texas, Mississippi, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, and other states that largely ban abortion. To be clear, this study is far from exhaustive; it is simply a snapshot. The interviewees were pulmonary and critical care medicine physicians. They described what they personally saw — there are almost surely many, many more cases that researchers and journalists haven’t heard about, and many, many more women whose lives have been shortened or ended because they weren’t offered safe abortions when they needed them.
Before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed Republican legislators to ban abortion in most of the states they control, the public narrative around abortion bans was simple: Make abortion illegal, and you get dangerous illegal abortions. And that remains true. But what much of the public didn’t seem to understand is that if you make abortion illegal, you get more dangerous pregnancies. It was easy, I think, to not worry so much about dangerous illegal abortions if you could tell yourself that you’d never have an illegal abortion, and neither would the women you care about (whether that’s true or not is a separate question). It’s a lot more complicated to realize that abortions are routinely life-saving and health-preserving; that if you are a person capable of becoming pregnant, or if you are a person who loves anyone who is capable of becoming pregnant, then you should see legal abortion as a life-saving necessity.
The truth is that we don’t actually know how many women have died because of abortion bans. We don’t know how many have become critically ill. We don’t know how many have lost organs or have lost their fertility or lost years of their lives. We don’t know because the states that ban abortion very intentionally don’t ask these questions or keep track of these horrors. In fact, some states that ban abortion have gone as far as to try to block efforts to figure out how many women’s lives are being lost. Georgia, for example, dismantled its maternal mortality commission in the wake of its abortion ban. Texas delayed releasing its maternal health data, it seemed in anticipation of bad news for the anti-abortion movement. It’s a kind of see no evil / speak no evil / hear no evil strategy to cover up the actual doing of evil.
Reporters from ProPublica have identified several other women who died because of abortion bans. Often, doctors waited hours or even days before providing women the kind of care that would have been standard when Roe v. Wade was the law of the land. By the time women got the care they needed — the care they would have gotten in more progressive states — it was too late.
ProPublica reporters also found that when Texas banned abortion, sepsis rates for pregnant women skyrocketed — suggesting that women who needed abortions were being refused them, and made to wait until they had deadly infections. Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death for hospital patients across the US. If you’re a pregnant woman in Texas, you’re now a lot more likely to develop it — and possibly die from it.
This is because of supposedly “pro-life” policy. In Texas, doctors face up to 99 years in prison for abortion. Doctors and anyone else in Texas can be sued for “aiding and abetting” abortion, which limits what many believe they can even tell women. While they can defend themselves by arguing that an abortion they performed was life-saving, they have to prove that in court — and it’s often the case that a doctor isn’t 100% sure a patient will die without an abortion until it’s too late. Texas, like most other anti-abortion states, does not offer a health exception to its abortion ban.
We don’t have the full picture of what abortion bans have wrought. We might never know the full scope of the damage, because the same people leveling these brutalities are the ones in charge of tracking them. Instead, what we have are snapshots: Data pulled by intrepid reporters. Women and their families brave enough to speak to the press. Doctors willing to speak anonymously with careful researchers.
It’s not a complete picture. But these snapshots still tell a dark story.
xx Jill
This message is sponsored by ACLU Foundation
The Trump Administration is pushing a dangerous and sweeping attempt to control our bodies, our families, and our lives and a Supreme Court case this term will shape the future of transgender people’s freedom – and bodily autonomy for all. The state of Tennessee wants the Supreme Court to expand its ruling overturning Roe v. Wade to allow the state to target transgender people’s autonomy over their own bodies. Continuing down this road will hurt everyone's freedom to control their bodies and lives.
The ACLU told the court that everyone deserves the freedom to control their bodies and seek the health care they need. The government has no right to deny a transgender person the health care they need, just as they have no right telling someone if, when, or how they start a family.
Join the ACLU in calling on the Supreme Court to uphold constitutional guarantees for everyone – including trans people. Add your name here.


The problem is that the suffering and death is a feature not a bug. To religious conservatives, the ideal woman is the one who sacrifices herself "for her baby" even when that "baby" has no chance of survival. They want to legally enforce making pregnancy and childbirth dangerous and deadly because they believe that's what their god decreed in Genesis and they believe that suffering ennobles women.
I watched Charlie Kirk debate some college students about this.
Picking on college students as a 30 year-old man is a pretty shity thing to do. But what's worse is he is so stubborn and pigheaded.